Legal Opinion

People v. Licata

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1971PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.

The agent in charge of plainclothes detectives at Aqueduct Race Track gave the defendant a written notice to leave the premises forthwith.. The notice ordered the defendant not to enter or remain at any time ’ ’ upon the premises of the track1, and that in the event he failed to comply with the order, he would be subject to summary arrest for criminal trespass. The defendant^ upon receiving the notice, threw it on the floor and said, “ I’ll be back.”

Four months later, a detective for the Thoroughbred Racing Bureau at Aqueduct, saw the defendant enter the track. Since he knew the defendant was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Aaron v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Collister v. . HaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Greenfeld v. Maryland Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. GainesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Cooper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. George Hadges v. Yonkers Racing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. People v. DashnawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API