People v. Licata
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.
The agent in charge of plainclothes detectives at Aqueduct Race Track gave the defendant a written notice to leave the premises forthwith.. The notice ordered the defendant not to enter or remain at any time ’ ’ upon the premises of the track1, and that in the event he failed to comply with the order, he would be subject to summary arrest for criminal trespass. The defendant^ upon receiving the notice, threw it on the floor and said, “ I’ll be back.”
Four months later, a detective for the Thoroughbred Racing Bureau at Aqueduct, saw the defendant enter the track. Since he knew the defendant was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Aaron v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Collister v. . HaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Greenfeld v. Maryland Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. GainesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cooper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- George Hadges v. Yonkers Racing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- People v. DashnawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.