Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Byers
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 23, 1946No. [No. 172, October Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.
Sections (a) and (d) of Rule 146 of the Maryland Racing Commission provide:
“ (a) No person shall administer, or knowingly or carelessly permit to be administered to any horse entered for a race, any drug in any way within forty-eight (48) hours before the time of the race.”
“(d) If the Commission finds from analysis of the saliva or urine, or blood taken from a horse on the day of a race in which the horse ran, or from other competent evidence, that any drug has been administered to the horse within forty-eight (48) hours before the race, the trainer shall be subject to the penalties…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Shields v. Utah Idaho Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Manley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Franklin v. Mazda Motor Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Morris v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.