Legal Opinion
Money v. Cullinane
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1978No. 10633, 10634, 10635, 10636, 10637, 10715 and 10730PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
Petitioners are District of Columbia police officers who unsuccessfully applied to the Metropolitan Police Department (Department) to be placed on administrative leave rather than expend their sick leave for the periods of time they were absent from duty because of illness or injury. 5 U.S.C. § 6324(a) (Supp. V 1975), provides that when District police cannot perform their duties as a result of service-connected injury or illness they are entitled to administrative leave. They have now filed in this court petitions for review of the Department’s rulings denying them…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dupont Circle Citizen's Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Johnson v. Board of Appeals and ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Wells v. District of Columbia Board of EducationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kegley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- District of Columbia v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ronda Nunnally v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Davis v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Barry v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.