Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1971No. 5634, 5635PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REILLY, Associate Judge:

Petitioners are former members of the United States Park Service, retired after hearings before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement Board (referred to herein as the “Retirement Board”) for disabilities not incurred in, nor aggravated by, the performance of duty. In the hearings before the Retirement Board, the officers did not deny that they were “disabled” (i. e., no longer fit to perform duty), but contended that the disability had been caused or aggravated by service in the force.

Deeming themselves aggrieved by contrary findings, 1 petitioners thereafter appealed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James R. Blohm v. Walter N. TobrinerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. Louie C. Wingo v. Walter E. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Matala v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kegley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Liberty v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Neer v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Barry v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API