Legal Opinion

Dubbs v. Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 20, 1990No. C-85-4379 EFLPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LYNCH, District Judge.

Defendants have renewed their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state any claim upon which relief may be granted, under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having considered the briefs and relevant precedent, the Court hereby denies defendants’ motion to dismiss this action, but dismisses plaintiff’s second claim with prejudice.

BACKGROUND

For the sake of brevity, the Court omits a lengthy recitation of the facts, and refers parties to the statement of facts contained in the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Dubbs v. CIA,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Madison-Hughes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Madison-Hughes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. 325-343 E. 56TH STREET CORP. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  4. Dahl v. Secretary of the United States NavyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
  5. Doe v. SchachterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API