Legal Opinion
Madison-Hughes v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 8, 1996No. 94-6626PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, and proposed interve-nors, Amy Cato, Charlotte Collins, and Treutland County Clients Council, appeal the order of the district court dismissing this action against defendants for failure to comply with alleged mandatory federal regulations under Title VI because the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.1 For the following reasons, we affirm the order of the district court.
I
On January 19,1993, the original plaintiffs, Vareda Madison-Hughes and the Tennessee Interfaith Coalition for Justice in Health Care, filed suit against defendants, the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Philip R. Joelson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Madison-Hughes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Moher v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
- US Ex Rel. Pogue v. American Healthcorp., Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1997
- San Francisco Baykeeper v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.