Paddock v. Hatch
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by Harold Paddock against William B. Hatch for the purchase price of goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
This is an action in assumpsit, brought to recover a balance claimed due on the purchase price of a second-hand Campbell printing press sold by plaintiff to defendant at Ypsilanti, Mich., on November 19,1908, for the sum of $500.
The case was tried in the circuit court of Washtenaw county by a jury, and a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff for $445. From a judgment rendered on such verdict, defendant has removed the proceeding to this court by writ of error.
It is undisputed that a sale and purchase of the printing press was negotiated between the parties, by virtue of which defendant took…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hammond v. HanninMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Price v. MarthenMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Hart v. GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- French v. NewberryMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- McAllister v. EngleMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pawlicki v. HollenbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Brusseau v. Potter's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Stone v. StreilMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- McRae v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Richards v. Rogers Boiler & Burner Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.