Legal Opinion

Brusseau v. Potter's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1921No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Monroe; Root (Jesse H.), J. Winifred Brusseau presented a claim against the estate of Thomas H. Potter, deceased, for services rendered. The claim was disallowed before the commissioners, and claimant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for claimant. Contestant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The deceased was a practicing physician in the city of Detroit, and was injured in a collision *167on the 5th day of February, 1915, from the result of which he died in February, 1918. Plaintiff worked for the doctor, both before and after the injury, as office woman, and this suit involves her claim for such services. There was testimony that the doctor répeatedly said he was to pay her $20 per week for such services. The only evidence on the part of defendant estate was the following receipt:

“Toledo, Ohio, June 2, 1917.
“Received from Dr. Thomas H. Potter a certain diamond removed from Dr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pratt v. CastleMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Leeson v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Goldsmith v. LichtenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Lauzon v. BellemeumerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Brevoort v. PartridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pawlicki v. HollenbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Hiscock v. HiscockMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Stone v. StreilMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Smith v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API