McAllister v. Engle
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ilnron. (Wixson, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwood, J,
The plaintiff brought his suit in assumpsit upon the common counts for two hundred and twenty-five dollars and interest thereon, and filed a bill of particulars. The defendants pleaded the general issue, and gave notice thereunder that the sum claimed by plaintiff was money belonging to them for services and expenses rendered and incurred by them in procuring a loan of $3000 for plaintiff from the Michigan Mutual Life Insurance Company, at Detroit, and that they held plaintiff’s receipt for the money on a settlement made of the claim. No question is made upon the pleadings.
It…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Polhemus v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Tupper v. KilduffMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Altman v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Mandigo v. MandigoMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Danielson v. DyckmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Golden v. Bartlett Illuminating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Paddock v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Richards v. Rogers Boiler & Burner Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929