Legal Opinion

People v. Wescott

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1950No. Crim. 2190PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Appellant Wescott and his codefendant Fehr were charged with the crime of murder, to which they both pleaded not guilty. At the conclusion of the prosecution’s ease Wescott moved for an advisory verdict and for a dismissal as to himself, both of which motions were denied. Fol lowing the jury’s return of verdicts of guilty against both defendants, Wescott moved for a new trial and how appeals from the denial thereof as well as from his judgment of conviction.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the respondent shows that immediately prior to the crime decedent Henry McAnally and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. Le GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. People v. ButterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. AndrusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. People v. BandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. HattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. GossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API