Legal Opinion

People v. Le Grant

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1946No. Crim. 3993PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem.

By indictment, Raymond Poche and the appealing defendants, Howard Le Grant and Vincent Poche, Jr., were accused of the crime of murder, a felony.

A trial by jury was waived by each defendant, and, following the court trial, Raymond Poche was exonerated and the appealing defendants were found guilty of .the crime of manslaughter, a felony, as a lesser offense than that charged in the indictment of murder but one necessarily included therein. From such judgment and from the order of the court denying them a motion for a new trial, such defendants jointly appeal.

While the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. People v. MummertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. People v. TalbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. PrettymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. VillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. BeltranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API