Legal Opinion
Mukand, Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 16, 2014No. 2013-1425PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Mukand, Ltd. (“Mukand”) appeals a decision of the Court of International Trade affirming the Department of Commerce’s application of adverse facts available in its calculation of an antidumping duty on Mu-kand’s imports of stainless steel bar from India. The Department of Commerce applied adverse facts available (“AFA”) after Mukand failed to provide production cost data broken down by product size as requested on five separate occasions. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
Upon the receipt of a proper request, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) is required…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Qvd Food Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Fresh Garlic Producers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Hung Vuong Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Husteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Maverick Tube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.