Legal Opinion
Pierce v. San Mateo County Sheriff's Department
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 2014No. A138278PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BANKE, J.
I. Introduction
After members of the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Gang Task Force allegedly conducted a warrantless search of her home, plaintiff and appellant Treyana Pierce filed this civil rights action under title 42 United States Code section 1983 (section 1983) against the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Department (Sheriff’s Department) and individual members of the gang task force, sued as Does 1 through 12. San Mateo County (appearing for the Sheriff’s department) successfully demurred to Pierce’s third amended complaint and procured a complete dismissal of the case. We agree…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Bank of New York Mellon v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Mackey v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Bocanegra v. JakubowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Bank of New York Mellon v. CitibankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.