Legal Opinion
Donegan v. Livingston
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 3, 2012No. Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-812PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff Siobhan Donegan claims her rights under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments were violated when she was detained and subjected to a Breathalyzer test by agents of her employer, the East Stroudsburg Area School District.1 As the Court finds the test justified as a special needs search, Donegan’s Fourth Amendment claim must fail. Moreover, as Donegan has failed to establish any infringement to her right of association under either the First or…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Donegan v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Metz v. Bethlehem Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- BRUMMELL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Begnoche v. ThompsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Derry v. BlackmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.