Legal Opinion
Begnoche v. Thompson
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 9, 2020No. 3:15-cv-02047Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAUL BEGNOCHE, : Petitioner, Vv. : 3:15-CV-2047 ; (JUDGE MARIANI) BRIAN THOMPSON, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM Pending before the Court is Petitioner Paul Begnoche’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 181). Petitioner seeks reconsideration of the Court's Order (Doc. 177) denying his “Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on the Merits of the Petition Pleadings” (Doc 164). The Court finds that Petitioner has not demonstrated a basis for reconsideration. “The purpose of a motion for reconsideration...is to correct manifest…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Ogden v. Keystone ResidenceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1441, Pens. Plan Guide P 23909g Robert B. Reich, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Fred Compton, Joseph McHugh John Nielsen, Frederick Hammerschmidt, Gersil N. Kay, Electrical Mechanics Association, the Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 98Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. JasinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.