Legal Opinion

City of Xenia v. Boehman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1996No. 95-CA-0117PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grady, Judge.

Louis I. Boehman, appearing pro se, appeals from his conviction in Xenia Municipal Court for speeding, in violation of Xenia Codified Ordinances 335.05.

App.R. 16(A) requires an appellant to present a statement of assignments of error for review. Boehman has failed to do that. However, a reading of his brief prompts us to conclude that Boehman has assigned error in the following respects.

First Assignment of Error

“Boehman’s conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence.”

In reviewing either the weight or sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction, the same test…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Leach v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HelkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. City of Lakewood v. SuleymanovLakewood Municipal Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API