Legal Opinion

Leach v. Dixon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1990No. Nos. CA 11928, 11581PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolff, Presiding Judge.

On April 10, 1989, Milton L. Sprowl, Acting Judge for the Honorable James F. Cannon (of the Dayton Municipal Court), rendered judgment in favor of Vivian Leach and against James S. Dixon, d.b.a. Val Pak, in the amount of $3,987.58 plus costs. On May 4, 1989, Dixon moved to vacate the judgment, pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B), for the reason that Sprowl was not a resident of the city of Dayton and thus lacked the qualifications for acting judge of the Dayton Municipal Court and “had no jurisdiction to hear the * * * case.” On May 4, 1989, Dixon also filed his notice of appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Demereaux v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Huffman v. ShafferOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. City of Lakewood v. SuleymanovLakewood Municipal Court · 2010
  3. City of Xenia v. BoehmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API