Legal Opinion

Randall v. City of Chadron

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1924No. 23104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This is an appeal from a consolidated action brought against the city of Chadron, a paving contractor, and a subcontractor, to recover damages occasioned by the flooding, by water overflowing from gutters in the street, of the basements of stores owned and operated by the respective plaintiffs. No service was had upon the other defendants, and the action proceeded to a judgment against the city, from which it has appealed.

The evidence is substantially to the etfect that in 1920 the city entered into a contract with the Ford Paving Company to curb, gutter and pave certain streets in the city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Atchison v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. City of Omaha v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Beatrice v. LearyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Tewksbury v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Beatrice v. ReidNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. City of Tucson v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Cattin v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Bethscheider v. City of HebronNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Young v. City of ScribnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API