Legal Opinion

Tewksbury v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1909No. 15,733PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the district court, for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, O. J.

This was an action against the city of Lincoln for personal injuries resulting from a fall upon the sidewalk crossing occasioned by the accumulation of ice caused by the leaking of water from the hydrant and hose in use in *572flushing a sewer. There is scarcely any dispute as to the facts, either as to the condition of the crossing caused by defendant, or the injury resulting from the fall. On Saturday, the 8th day of December, 1906, a sewer drain became clogged or dammed, and a hose was attached to a hydrant on the corner of Twelfth and O streets, and the water was carried through…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Maxmilian v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Barton v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. McMahon v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Enyeart v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Updike v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Murray v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Pinches v. Village of DickensNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Rockhold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API