Legal Opinion

Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. Green

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 12, 1941No. Civil Action No. 20161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILKIN, District Judge.

This is an action for patent and trademark infringement. The plaintiff, who is a manufacturer of vacuum cleaners, alleges that the defendant has re-assembled parts of the plaintiff’s cleaner and reconstructed and sold vacuum cleaners and parts in violation of the plaintiff’s patents and trademarks. There is not much dispute about the facts. The questions raised are mainly issues of law.

The court finds that the defendant has no right to reconstruct vacuum cleaners and sell them equipped with dust bags bearing the plaintiff’s registered trade-marks “Premier” or “Premier…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cotton-Tie Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Automotive Parts Co. v. Wisconsin Axle Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  3. Coty v. Prestonettes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. Ingersoll v. DoyleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917
  5. General Electric Co. v. Re-New Lamp Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Precision Rebuilders, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API