Legal Opinion

Automotive Parts Co. v. Wisconsin Axle Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1935No. 6975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The patents in suit, Nos. 1,571,801 and 1,730,900, are combination patents rélatiijg to an automobile axle. The appellee, as owner of the patents, makes and sells, without restriction, the patented structures. Among the parts of each of the structures are beveled gear pairs and a wheel driving shaft, neither of which is patented. ^ The appellant makes and sells gears and driving shafts designed for use in appellee’s axles, This is a suit for contributory infringement of the patents resulting from the appellant’s selling such parts. The defenses are invalidity and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Shickle, Harrison & Howard Iron Co. v. St. Louis Car-Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. Foglesong Mach. Co. v. J. D. Randall Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  5. Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. Eaton Axle & Spring Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1931

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Landis MacHinery Co. v. Chaso Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. Southwestern Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. United States Rubber Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Lempco Products, Inc. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  5. Autographic Register Co. v. Sturgis Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API