Ingersoll v. Doyle
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Equity. Suit by Robert H. Ingersoll and others against Edward L. Doyle and others. On complainants’ motion for preliminary injunction and defendants’ motion to dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
DODGE, Circuit Judge.
The defendants dispute neither the facts alleged in the bill nor those set forth in the plaintiffs’ affidavits. All *621said facts are admitted for the purposes of this hearing. Nor have the defendants contended that their dealings, as thus admitted, with watches of the plaintiffs’ manufacture bearing the marks, containing the guaranty, and marketed in the boxes which the hill describes, do not violate the plaintiffs’ exclusive rights in the registered mark “Ingersoll,” as designating watches of their manufacture, and in the words “Midget” and “Radiolite,” used in connection…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Searchlight Gas Co. v. Prest-O-Lite Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- Coca-Cola Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- General Electric Co. v. Re-New Lamp Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904
- General Electric Co. v. Re-New Lamp Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1903
3Cited by16 opinions
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. ReichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Coty v. Prestonettes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Bulova Watch Co. v. Allerton Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Universal Relay Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.