Mozes v. Borlaug
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
There was a verdict for plaintiff. On defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, judgment was ordered for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the order.
About 10 p. m. of October 12, 1931, plaintiff, driving his Chevrolet car south on Thirty-sixth avenue south over Thirty-seventh street, Minneapolis, collided with a Ford car driven east on Thirty-seventh by defendant. Plaintiff sues to recover for the damage his Chevrolet car sustained in the collision. The only question presented by the appeal is: Does the evidence as a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dehaan v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Rosenau v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Reddy v. Rex Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Duffey v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Haeg v. Sprague, Warner Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Spensley v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Ballweber v. KleistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Nye v. BachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.