Spensley v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
This action, originally brought by A. C. Schirmer to recover $250,000 from defendants for alleged services performed by him on their behalf, is based upon both an express and an implied agreement covering work in connection with the acquisition of surface rights in the Pillsbury and Southern Additions to the village of Hibbing.
At the close of the testimony the court directed a verdict for all the defendants on the implied contract action because barred by the statute of limitations, and in favor of all the defendants except the Oliver Iron Mining Company on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Brulla v. CassadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Giermann v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Karras v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1931
- Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Jeske v. George R. Wolff Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. PaskewitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.