Hall v. Hall

TIREY, Justice.

This action is one for breach of an oral contract and damages. At the conclusion of the evidence motion for instructed verdict was overruled and the jury in its verdict found substantially (1 and 2) that about October 13, 1953, H. D. Hall and J. D. Hall, Jr., mutually agreed that H. D. Hall should develop and sell Visador products in the northern territory for a reasonable time thereafter, and that three years was a reasonable time; (3j 4 and 5) that H. D. Hall’s contract was terminated by J. D. Hall, Jr., as of September 1, 1955 without just cause, and that H. D. Hall was…