Legal Opinion
OM Franklin Serum Company v. CA Hoover & Son
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 13, 1969No. 7883PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENTON, Chief Justice.
Our former opinion is withdrawn and the following opinion is submitted in lieu thereof.
This is a products liability case. C. A. Hoover and Dale Hoover, a partnership, d/b/a C. A. Hoover & Son, brought this suit against O. M. Franklin Serum Company, alleging the death and injury to calves as a result of the use of an antibiotic consisting of penicillin and dihydrostrep-tomycin sold under the trade name of “Franklin Pen-Strep”. Based on a jury verdict the trial court entered judgment for the plaintiffs.
On October 14, 1964, Dale Hoover injected 28 of their registered…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Hall v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Bock v. Fellman Dry Goods Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoover and Son v. OM Franklin Serum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- El Rancho Restaurants, Inc. v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969