Legal Opinion

Paschall v. Anderson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1936No. 6570PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge GERMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Plaintiffs in error, Roy Paschall and wife, sued defendant in error, O. T. Anderson, in the District Court of Young County to recover the sum of $1000.00 and interest. The parties will be designated as in the trial court. Plaintiffs based their suit upon a contract alleged and proven to have been made in July, 1929. The substance of the contract, as shown by proof of plaintiffs, was that plaintiff Roy Paschall would take charge of the ranch owned by defendant and would manage same as foreman for the remainder of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Shute v. DorrNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Lower v. WintersNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  4. Drummond v. A. & N. BurrellNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  5. Anderson v. PaschallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Miller v. Riata Cadillac CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Chevalier v. Lane's, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wiley v. BertelsenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Francis v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1937

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API