Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Bank of Rutherford

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1905PublishedCited by 31 opinions

PROM GIBSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Gibson County. — John S. Cooper, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

The hill was filed by complainant bank against the defendant bank to recover from it the amount of a, *66forged check, which was drawn on complainant bank, for $54.75, and, after being indorsed bj the defendant bank and others, was presented to, and paid by, complainant bank.

The check was in the words and figures following:

“Dyer, Tenn., Octo. 28, 1903.
“Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank:
“Pay to J. L. Freeman, or bearer, fifty-four 75-100 dollars. For cotton.
“Johnston Mero. Co.”

The ground upon which the recovery was sought was that the Bank of Rutherford was negligent in cashing this check for a stranger…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People's Bank v. Franklin BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Unaka National Bank v. Butler ex rel. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. First Nat. Bank v. United States Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Farmers National Bank v. Farmers & Traders BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Lawyers Title Insurance v. United American Bank of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1998
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Greater St. Matthews Baptist Church v. First National Bank of Memphis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API