Legal Opinion

No.

Colorado Attorney General Reports

Decided April 24, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Capp Shanks Division of Local Government 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado

Dear Mr. Shanks:

I am writing in response to your request for an opinion on the legality of a proposed ordinance concerning the extension of utilities and strip annexations for the Town of Berthoud. Specifically, I am addressing the two questions posed by your inquiry.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED AND CONCLUSIONS

1. May the ordinance impose a more restrictive requirement of contiguity than that imposed by the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965?

It is my opinion that while a municipal ordinance may impose additional terms and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beshore v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. Kitty Hawk Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Bennion v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Adams v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API