Legal Opinion
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 22, 2020No. Consol. 19-00056Published
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 20- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI 9(7,&$5(7$ù Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge Plaintiff, AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, Consol. Court No. 19-00056 et al., PUBLIC VERSION Consolidated Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, et al., Defendant-Intervenors, and BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI 9(7,&$5(7$ù, Consolidated Defendant- Intervenor. OPINION AND ORDER [Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand are sustained] Dated: May 22, 2020 Julie C. Mendoza, Donald B. Cameron, R.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cs Wind Vietnam Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Gerdau Ameristeel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.