Legal Opinion

Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 2004No. A105444PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

Plaintiffs Anthony and Maxlyn Cadlo appeal a summary judgment in favor of defendant Owens-Illinois, Inc., in their action for personal injuries and loss of consortium based on Anthony Cadlo’s exposure to Kaylo, an insulation product containing asbestos once made by Owens-Illinois. The Cadlos contend the trial court erred in sustaining Owens-Illinois’s demurrer to their causes of action for fraud, deceit, and concert of action. They also contend there are triable issues of fact regarding design defects in Kaylo.

We conclude that Owens-Illinois’s historic role in the design,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Vega v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
  5. Area 51 Prods., Inc. v. City of Alameda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API