Legal Opinion
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 2009No. A120072PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARGULIES, J.
Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (National), provided excess insurance to the workers’ compensation program of the Bank of America (Bank), which was administered by defendant Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. (Cambridge). National filed suit against Cambridge, alleging that as a result of Cambridge’s negligence in handling a workers’ compensation claim, National was required to reimburse over $1.5 million in medical expenses of a former Bank employee. The complaint pleaded claims for negligence, breach of contract, negligent…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- West v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Mintz v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Agence France Presse v. MorelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. FSI, Financial Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.