Quist v. Kiichli
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $10,000 for slander. From an order, Harrison, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The complaint, in substance, alleges that during a term of the district court beginning September 14, 1903, appellant was the duly appointed and acting foreman of the grand jury, who were conducting an investigation of the official conduct of certain members of the city Council of Minneapolis for the purpose of determining whether any of them had been guilty of receiving bribes, and that a short time prior to the investigation respondent had been president of the council. The complaint then proceeds as follows:
That on the 6th day of October, A. D. 1903, at Minneapolis, Minnesota, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stroebel v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Davis v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. ShippmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Herringer v. IngbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Nord v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sheibley v. AshtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Brill v. Minnesota Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Larson v. R. B. Wrigley Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Rudawsky v. Northwestern Jobbers Credit BureauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931