Rudawsky v. Northwestern Jobbers Credit Bureau
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Defendants appeal from an order overruling their demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, the court having certified that the question presented by the demurrer was in its opinion important and doubtful..
This is a libel action. In the • complaint the following facts (abbreviated) are alleged: Plaintiff was a traveling salesman in the employ of Samuel Rudawsky, Nathan Rudawsky, and Henry Rudawsky, a copartnership, doing business under the name of S. Rudawsky & Sons. The copartnership was adjudged a bankrupt, and defendant Rodgers was appointed receiver and thereafter trustee.
Rodgers and other…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pratt v. Pioneer Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- McDermott v. Union Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Byram v. AikenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Turner v. BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Davis v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gadach v. Benton County Co-Op Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952