Herringer v. Ingberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Norman county, Watts, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict for $250, or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action for libel, in which plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
The facts are as follows; In 1900 the authorities of Norman county •entered into contracts for the construction of what is called the “Hen-•drum-Hegne Ditch,” which extends through the county from east tG west for a distance of sixteen miles. The contracts were entered inte in July, and by their terms the ditch was to be completed by January 1, 1901. Some of the contractors completed portions of the ditch covered by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDermott v. Union Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Davis v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Stewart v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. ShippmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Wilcox v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. Independent Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1914
- Talbot v. MackNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- Clancy v. Daily News CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Brill v. Minnesota Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Fullerton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.