Legal Opinion

Nord v. Gray

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1900No. Nos. 12,061—(149)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $15,-000 damages for slander. The case was tried before Pond, J., who directed a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Action for slander, tried to a court and jury. At the close of the evidence, upon defendant’s motion, the court directed a verdict in his favor. The complaint, in substance, alleges that plaintiff had been a trusted employee of the S. E. Olson Company of Minneapolis, and had charge of the dairy department of that concern; that he had bought dairy products from the Willmar Creamery Company, and had fixed the prices paid therefor; that, after the termination of his connection with the Olson Company, the defendant, who was superintendent of such company, directed and applied the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stroebel v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Quinn v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  3. Richmond v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Abraham v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Burch v. BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Stewart v. RileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. ShippmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. National Cash Register Co. v. SallingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API