Legal Opinion

A & P Tea Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1988No. Appeal, 562 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

This is an appeal by the A & P Tea Company (Employer) from an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referees decision dismissing Employers petition for suspension or modification of benefits. An understanding of the procedural history of this case is critical.

On June 28, 1978 Patricia Giglio (Claimant) sustained a compensable injury. Benefits were paid by Employer. Then on June 23, 1982 Employer-filed a petition seeking alternatively to suspend or modify benefits. The petition was later amended at hearing to one seeking a termination of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Arena v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Kunicki v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Hammermill Paper Co. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. M & D Auto Body v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Shustack v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Simeone v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Trudnak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API