A & P Tea Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
This is an appeal by the A & P Tea Company (Employer) from an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referees decision dismissing Employers petition for suspension or modification of benefits. An understanding of the procedural history of this case is critical.
On June 28, 1978 Patricia Giglio (Claimant) sustained a compensable injury. Benefits were paid by Employer. Then on June 23, 1982 Employer-filed a petition seeking alternatively to suspend or modify benefits. The petition was later amended at hearing to one seeking a termination of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Arena v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Kunicki v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hammermill Paper Co. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by14 opinions
- M & D Auto Body v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Shustack v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Simeone v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Trudnak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.