Legal Opinion

In Re Managed Care Litigation

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided February 10, 2006No. MDL No. 1334. Master File No. 00-1334-MDPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION

MORENO, District Judge.

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the December 5, 2005 Report and Recommendation of Special Master Rodolfo Sorondo, Jr., Esq. (D.E. No. 4664), filed by the Court on December 20,2005.

THE COURT has examined the entire file and record and heard oral argument on February 9, 2006. The Court has made a de novo review of the issues presented. Being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is

ADJUDGED that the Court declines to adopt Special Master Rodolfo Sorondo, Jr., Esq.’s Report and Recommendation, dated December…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Twin Laboratories Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
  4. Suss v. MSX International Engineering Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tennessee Medical Ass'n v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  2. BARHAM v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API