Legal Opinion
Suss v. MSX International Engineering Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 19, 2002No. 02 Civ. 0667(RMB)(RLE)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
ELLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the request by plaintiff and counter-defendant Karen Suss, and counter-defendants Laurence A. Levine, Lar-kav, Inc., and Karlar Temporaries, Inc. (collectively, “movants”), for an order directing *160defendant MSX International Engineering Services, Inc. (“MSX”) to produce certain documents from its privilege log. According to movants, these documents were shown to witnesses prior to their depositions in order to refresh their recollections, and under Federal Rule of Evidence 612 must now be produced for inspection. For the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Leucadia, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clampitt v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Teleglobe USA, Inc. v. BCE Inc. (In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Thomas v. Euro RSCG LifeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- In Re Rivastigmine Patent Litigation (MDL NO. 1661)District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.