Legal Opinion
Ina Collins v. Mary Kay Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 19, 2017No. 16-3178PublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RESTREPO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Ina M. Collins, who worked as a beauty- consultant in New Jersey for Defendant-Appellee Mary Kay, Inc. brought this putative class action in the United States District Court for the District of, New Jersey,-claiming that certain Mary Kay policies and practices violated the New Jersey Wage Payment Law (“NJWPL”). .Mary Kay moved to dismiss the suit on forum non conveniens grounds, relying on two written agreements that set forth terms and conditions of the parties’ relationship. Both agreements contained forum selection clauses…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- In Re McGraw-hill Global Educ. Holdings LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Reading Health System v. Bear Stearns Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Lakeside Surfaces, Inc. v. Cambria Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Farhad Azima v. Rak Investment AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Galo Coba v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.