Ocampo v. City of Racine
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Three issues are presented on this appeal:
1. Is the notice requirement in sec. 81.15, Stats., a condition precedent to the right to maintain an action, or is it a statute of limitation ?
2. Is the notice requirement in sec. 81.15 applicable to a minor ?
3. If the notice requirement in sec. 81.15 applies to a minor, is it constitutional ?
Giving of Notice is Condition Precedent.
As pertinent here, sec. 81.15, Stats., states:
“. . . No such action shall be maintained unless within 120 days after the happening of the event causing such damages, notice in writing signed by the party, his agent of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hughes v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Reed v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Reistad v. ManzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Benson v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. MallettWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Yotvat v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Mannino v. DavenportWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Raisanen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.