Black v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAUZY, Justice.
We consider whether the recovery of attorney’s fees against a state agency under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code chapter 105 requires a finding that the cause of action was frivolous, unreasonable or without foundation; and if so, whether such a finding was made in this case. The trial court, sitting without a jury, determined that the Texas Department of Human Services acted frivolously, unreasonably and without foundation. The court, therefore, submitted the question of reasonable attorney’s fees to the jury in a subsequent trial. The court of appeals reversed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Interest of W.E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Vortt Exploration Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Carter v. William Sommerville and Son, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
- Wirth, Ltd. v. Panhandle Pipe and Steel Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Amos v. SenglemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- El Paso Electric Co. v. Texas Department of InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Berg v. AMF INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Attorney General of Texas Ex Rel. State v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Dallas County Constable Precinct No. 5 v. Garden City Boxing Club, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.