Legal Opinion

Black v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1992No. D-1536PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAUZY, Justice.

We consider whether the recovery of attorney’s fees against a state agency under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code chapter 105 requires a finding that the cause of action was frivolous, unreasonable or without foundation; and if so, whether such a finding was made in this case. The trial court, sitting without a jury, determined that the Texas Department of Human Services acted frivolously, unreasonably and without foundation. The court, therefore, submitted the question of reasonable attorney’s fees to the jury in a subsequent trial. The court of appeals reversed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Interest of W.E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Vortt Exploration Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Carter v. William Sommerville and Son, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Wirth, Ltd. v. Panhandle Pipe and Steel Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Amos v. SenglemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. El Paso Electric Co. v. Texas Department of InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Berg v. AMF INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Attorney General of Texas Ex Rel. State v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Dallas County Constable Precinct No. 5 v. Garden City Boxing Club, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API