Legal Opinion

Amos v. Sengleman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1944No. 11656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEITH, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding brought by appellant, Roberta Marilyn Amos, against Dr. W. A. Sengleman for the custody of Paul Millard Amos, appellant’s infant son about 18 months of age. J. Earl Braden and his wife, Marjorie Braden, intervened in the proceeding, alleging that the child had been placed in their care and custody by a Mrs. Wilma Halliburton, who had assured them that its father and mother had relinquished all interest and claim in it and had agreed that she might adopt it, but that circumstances had arisen which would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Legate v. LegateTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. NeffTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Davis v. SearsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Tunnell v. ReevesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Duckworth v. ThompsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Black v. Dallas County Child Welfare UnitTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Chapman v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Crawford v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Black v. Dallas County Child Welfare UnitTexas Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API