Legal Opinion

State v. Hammerquist

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1940No. File No. 8353PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P.J.

The appellants challenge the authority of the trial court to increase the compensation fixed by the verdict of the jury in a proceeding to condemn property for public use under the power of eminent domain.

The state determined to exercise its power of eminent domain and take the Pennington County farm home of the defendants Martha E. Hammerquist and Anton W. Hammerquist for a public use. In the proceeding brought under §§ 2938 to 2953, Rev. Code 1919, SDC 37.40, to fix the compensation of the defendants, the Hammerquists defaulted. The jury impaneled returned a verdict of $3,000, and judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Owen and Memorial ParksMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Boshart v. National Benefit Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Walters v. GilhamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. BloomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. City of Huron v. JelgerhuisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hogg v. First National Bank of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Union Storage & Transfer Co. v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hogg v. First National Bank of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API