Legal Opinion

In Re Owen and Memorial Parks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1928No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 33,836PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The city of Detroit instituted this proceeding to condemn substantially four acres of land for park purposes. The first jury found no necessity. A new trial was granted, resulting in a finding of necessity by the second jury and an award of $1,591,083.69. A motion for a new trial on behalf of the city based on various grounds was heard on testimony taken in open court, some two weeks being consumed in such hearing. At the conclusion the trial judge found that the award was excessive, and ordered that a new trial be granted unless the owners consented to a reduction of the award by the sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minot v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Ayer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Plaskett ex rel. PlaskettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Ontonagon Railroad Co. v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. City of Grand Rapids v. CoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Widening of Bagley AvenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re Widening of Michigan Ave.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Cleveland v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State Board of Education v. Von ZellenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API