Legal Opinion

Hogg v. First National Bank of Aberdeen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1986No. 14920, 14921PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

This is an appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and the defendants’ counterclaim. Plaintiffs appeal this adverse verdict. Defendants appeal the denial of their post-verdict motions to increase the damage award of $375,000. This case concerns the propriety of certain bank transactions but the verdict is based upon a promissory note. We affirm in part and modify in part; namely, we modify the judgment below to increase the amount to $468,556.79.

PARTIES

Plaintiffs-appellants are Daryl and Donna Hogg, d/b/a Hogg Hereford Farms. Plaintiffs will be referred…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mueller v. MuellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Highway Commission v. BloomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lang v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  5. United States v. KrasnovDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. HoferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Knudson v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sybesma v. SybesmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wells v. BillarsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API