Legal Opinion

Mayes v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 31, 2000No. 1:99-cv-00356PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

COLLIER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of pro se petitioner 1 David Mayes (“Mayes”) to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Court File No. 1, Petition). Pursuant to the Court’s Order, the United States filed a response to petitioner’s motion (Court File No. 6, Government’s Response).

The underlying criminal case in this Court was United States of America v. Renee Kinney and David Mayes, Criminal Docket No. 1:97-cr-24, filed on March 18, 1997. For the following reasons, the Court will DENY Mayes’s motion. 2

1.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. OsborneDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
  2. Garnica v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2005
  3. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
  4. Drane v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  5. Farrad v. USA (TV1)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API