Legal Opinion

Garnica v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 10, 2005No. 1:03-cr-00022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

COLLIER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of pro se petitioner Hector Garnica (“Petitioner”) to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Court File Nos. 1, 3). Petitioner filed a memorandum in support of his petition (Court File No. 4) and, pursuant to the Court’s Order (Court File No. 5), the United States filed a response (Court File No. 7) to which Petitioner filed a reply (Court File No. 9). The Court finds the materials thus submitted, together with the complete record of the underlying criminal case, 1 conclusively…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2021
  2. Holland v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. Powell v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  4. Stoltz v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API