Legal Opinion

United States v. Osborne

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 23, 2003No. 2:02-cv-00324PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

COLLIER, District Judge.

The defendant Mitchell D. Osborne (“Osborne”) has filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Court File No.l). Osborne contends that his judgment of conviction and sentence should be vacated, set aside, or corrected because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Osborne claims counsel was ineffective when he failed to amend his appellate brief with an Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) claim and when he waived petitioner’s right to a full transcript on appeal.

I…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adames, Juan Eligio GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Sorto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. David Samaripas Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
  4. State v. LeggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Adames, Juan Eligio GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API