Legal Opinion

Farrad v. USA (TV1)

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 10, 2025No. 3:19-cv-00434Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE MALIK FIRST BORN ALLAH FARRAD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Nos. 3:19-CV-434-TAV-DCP v. ) 3:14-CR-110-TAV-DCP ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner Malik Farrad previously filed a Pro Se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255

alleging the ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel for failing to challenge the sufficiency of the Government’s proof on the date of the offense1 (“the date theory”) [Doc. 1 p. 10].2 United States District Judge…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API